Private money lenders for personal loans

She assigned me to a member of the team who then disappeared before I could contact him, as I was reassigned to another. They sent me a letter saying my file would be escalated. I thought that would be a good thing, but they escalated it to a quicker denial. Seems to me, the best results come when you walk into the Home Modification Center with a suitcase full of papers. I agree, Jerry, it is i need 1000 dollars now definitely worth the drive to not have to deal with the private money lenders for personal loans disappearing docs act. I had a two hour ride to my nearest one, the only one in the state, lol.

The comments by me and the materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice. Most of the information you find here is easily available on the internet. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney. Please Read our Privacy Policy and Legal Disclaimer Get free mortgage help today. Since 2007, the LoanSafe forums have helped millions of homeowners over the last 13 years either save their homes with a loan same day online payday loans modification, obtain a short sale, forbearance, or walk away legally from their underwater mortgages.

But that was a procedural issue, not an issue where the court tried the matter on the merits and made that decision.

It could go either way, but I would not count on this being sufficient proof to put an end to this deal. I dont know if this would be the exact same, because in your case, the bank refused to participate in the discovery process. A summary judgment is not exactly the same as an involuntary dismissal on other grounds, perhaps. Since 2007, the LoanSafe forums have helped millions of homeowners over the last 13 online loans fast years either save their homes with a loan modification, obtain a short sale, forbearance, or walk away legally from their underwater mortgages. Our Summary judgement PROVED and ADJUDGED that CHASE DOES NOT OWN the the note and they should collect anything.


Cash advance miami

Our Summary judgement PROVED and ADJUDGED that CHASE DOES NOT OWN the the note and they should private money lenders for personal loans collect anything. I am not an attorney, but if JPAnti-Christ did not own the loan, and if that was proved in court, then how can the new pretender lender come after private money lenders for personal loans you? I would really like to hear more about your situation, can you tell me more? My thought is also, how can some buy something that was never the original sellers to begin with?? I have seen many mortgage servicers collect on loans and foreclose on properties private money lenders for personal loans where legal local payday loans ownership of the note was questionable. I have seen some homeowners fight and delay based on this defense. The comments by me and the materials available at this web site are for informational purposes only and not for the purpose of providing legal advice.

Most of the information you find here is easily available on the internet. You should contact your attorney to obtain advice with respect to any particular issue or problem. The opinions expressed at or through this site are the opinions of the individual author and may not reflect the opinions of the firm or any individual attorney.

Many of us are facing original lenders, and still have plenty of reasons to doubt what they claim regarding ownership of the note. Would you be willing to share some more info or maybe private money lenders for personal loans post up docs from your court case? I am actually in a somewhat similar situation, though the lender sold the loan while the foreclosure case was still in the early stages, but I have reason to believe that the original lender did not own the loan when they initiated foreclosure, and therefore, they had no legal authority to sell it to the current owner either.

My thought is also, how can some buy something that was never the original sellers to begin with??

The new pretender lender can try all they want to come after you, but I seriously doubt they can do anything to get you to pay. Maybe your attorney can send them a letter explaining that the loan purchased from Chase was a loan that Chase never owned, and mention the SJ and that might make them back off.


Fast money loans

Talk about unjust enrichment, this is something that Chase does all the time.

Chase always says, We have done nothing wrong the fact that Chase exists is personal money loans wrong. Seems like Chase is getting caught more and more now. There was a recent case in Florida were Chase could not prove standing and on appeal, the court reversed private money lenders for personal loans the foreclosure judgement, and ruled in favor of the homeowner. I am not an attorney and my comments should not be used as any type of legal advice. Seek your own attorney in your own state to best protect your rights. Our Summary judgement PROVED and ADJUDGED that CHASE DOES NOT OWN the the note and they should collect anything. This sounds like a great cause for a Quiet Title, Chase can not come after you, whomever they sold the loan to can not come after you because according to the court Chase never owned the loan.

The original lender almost never comes after you because they probably sold the loan and got paid on it, they legally can not come after you. You probably also have a clouded title if Chase sold the loan.

They just instantly created a debt out of thin air. I want to possibly use this as education for my private money lenders for personal loans situation as well ( see the thread About to get Served). I am currently using the same argument in my case, and for you folks that are not familiar with my case, I am challenging the non-existing assignment of my note and mortgage from a company that went belly up in 2009 but cleverly assigned my note and mortgage to XXX bank, in 2010, name omitted due to current litigation, Some of these greedy banks purchased notes and mortgages that simply did not exist. The banksters got suckered into purchasing items that clearly did not exist and now they want to collect from us.

If anyone is interested in more background of my situation, please visit the NJ foreclosure timeline thread and or ask for my email address....

If we can show the court that the banks purchased a bill of goods that never existed, then we have good case law on our side and also a great cause of action to defeat their summary judgment motion.. I am currently using the same argument in my case, and for you folks that are not familiar with my case, I am challenging the non-existing assignment of my note and mortgage from a company that went belly up in 2009 but cleverly assigned my note and mortgage to money loans quick XXX bank, in 2010, name omitted due to current litigation, Some of these greedy banks purchased notes and mortgages that simply did not exist.

The banksters got suckered into purchasing items that clearly did not exist and now they want to collect from us. If anyone is interested in more background of my situation, please visit the NJ foreclosure timeline thread and or ask for my email address....

If we can show the court that the banks purchased a bill of goods that never existed, then we have good case law on our side and also a great cause of action to defeat their summary judgment motion.. Curious how this worked out… this is the original poster and nothing has happened. Curious how this worked out… this is the original poster and nothing has happened. You may want to study Quite title statutes for your state..

Trying to bring this back current- bc it looks like pennymac may file a lawsuit in April 2017. With The Bartram suit… i guess makes it ok for them to file against us….

My question… Pennymac purchased the Loan from Chase in January of 2015 after we won our case(Sept 2014) with Judgment stating to Chase stating there was no mortgage. Can this be defended that Pennymac purchased a loan that did not exist? Trying to bring this back current- bc it looks like pennymac may file a lawsuit in April 2017. With The Bartram suit… i guess makes it ok for them to file against us….

My question… Pennymac purchased the Loan payday loans joplin mo from Chase in January of 2015 after we won our case(Sept 2014) with Judgment stating to Chase stating there was no mortgage.

Can this be defended that Pennymac purchased a loan that did not exist? OP, Anyone can file a complaint, if they file against you, file a motion to dismiss, they have no standing and they were sold a false bill of goods It is helpful to stop thinking of these names as banks or financial institutions we realized long ago they are not the banks we originally knew as banks.